Please prove this wrong!
Saturday, March 10, 2012 Another hidden secret in Obamacare - “RFID Chip Implants”
Another hidden secret in Obamacare - “RFID Chip Implants”
Are you ready to have your RFID Chip Implanted ?
3/23/2013 is your date!
By Fred Brownbill on February 14, 2012 in Constitution Legal Watch
This new Health Care (Obamacare) law requires an RFID chip implanted in all of us. This chip will
not only contain your personal information with tracking capability but it will also be linked to your
bank
account. And..... get this, Page 1004 of the new law (dictating
the timing of this chip)reads and I quote: "Not later than 36 months
after the date of the enactment."
It
is now the law of the land that by March 23rd 2013 we will all be
required to have an RFID chip underneath our skin and this chip
will be link to our bank accounts as well as have our personal records
a nd tracking capability built into it.
On
Sunday March 21, 2010 the Senate Healthcare bill HR3200 was passed
and signed into law the f ollowing Tuesday. Page 1004 of the new law
(dictating the timing of this chip), reads, and I quote:
“Not later than 36 months after the date of the enactment” H.R. 3200 section 2521, Pg. 1001, paragraph 1.
“The
Secretary shall establish a national medical device registry (in
this subsection referred to as the ‘registry’) to facilitate analysis
of post-market safety and outcomes data on each device that— ‘‘is or
h as been used in or on a patient; ‘‘and is— ‘‘a class III
device; or ‘‘a class II device that is implantable, life-supporting, or
life-sustaining.”
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act:
A
class II implantable device is an “implantable radio frequency
transponder system for patient identification and health
information.” The purpose of a class II device is to collect data in
medical patients s uch as “claims data, patient survey data, and
standardized analytic files that allow for the pooling and analysis of
data from disparate data environments, electronic health records, and
any other data d eemed appropriate by the Secretary.”
Class III devises are items such as breast implants, pacemakers, heart valves, etc.
A
Class II device that is implantable is, as you seen from the FDA,
an implantable radio frequency transponder, RFID chip. From breast
implants, to pacemakers, to RFID chips which one is the only possible
one that c an used for the stated purpose in section B which is,
“for linking such data with the information included in the
registry”? As we know from subsection A, the information in the registry
is the name of a device. In plain speak, we are in a clear way
being told that our electronic medical records are going to be linked to
a class II implantable device!
On
Sunday March 21, 2010 the Senate Healthcare bill HR3200 was passed
and signed into law the following Tuesday. Like I said before, there
are a legion of horrible and just plain evil aspects to this bill and
I’m sure you’ve heard a lot of them by now. I don’t want to discount
t hem but what cannot be missed here is this new law now opens a
prophetic door on a magnitude not seen since the reformation of
Israel.
“The
Secretary to protect the public health; shall establish procedures
to permit linkage of information submitted pursuant to subparagraph
(A, remember subparagraph A is the class 2 implantable device
reference) with patient safety and outcomes data obtained under
paragraph (3, which is electronic medical records); and to permit
analyses of linked data;”
Continuing
on to page 1007, in the STANDARDS, IMPLEMENTATION CRITERIA, AND
CERTIFICATION CRITERIA section, the secretary of health and human
services is given full power to intact all mandates from the laundry
list of to-do items in the creation process of the registry as well
as dictate how the devises listed in the National Medical Device
Registry are to be used and implemented.
“The
Secretary of the Health Human Services, acting through the head of
the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information
Technology, shall adopt standards, implementation specifications, and
certification criteria for the electronic exchange and use in
certified electronic health records of a unique device identifier for
each device described in paragraph 1 (National Medical Device
Registry), if such an identifier is required by section 519(f) of the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 360i(f)) for the
device.”
No comments:
Post a Comment